Machines
4
Music
Affordable Products for the Audiophile Designed and Engineered in England
HiFi Pig
Mark Coogan
Following my most recent record stabiliser, the “puck” that’s not a puck from David @MCRU. I agreed to test this new kid on the block against the competition, or at least the competition I have to hand at home. Vinyl is my main source of choice and although press reviews in the “comics” have their place, I prefer to use my own ears and my many years of vinyl playback to decide on an opinion. Obviously, this is my opinion, but over the years, my approach has been consistent when evaluating different vinyl accessories, where usually if it makes a positive difference, I will buy the product. I am lucky that across the hi-fi industry, I often get new things sent to me for trial and I am still amazed that there is still a thirst for that Vinyl Valhalla, for retrieving as much detail, balanced and musical as possible from the record groove.
I have no affiliation with any manufacturers or suppliers, and I am not a reviewer; my views are my own based on certain criteria and hopefully my feedback is of some assistance for anyone looking for a record stabiliser.
Equipment
I could have used many turntables to undertake these tests, but I decided on my Nottingham “Anna Log” turntable as the reference point. One reason being, that Toms designs are very musical, the Anna Log especially is designed not to use a proprietary mat, as it uses a graphite platter top around 25mm thick that deals with the record support. This levels the playing field as many of the record stabilisers/pucks have “mated” record mats so for these tests if we can call them that, is designed to compare apples with apples.
Next up is the Anna 12” unpivot arm, I have tried many, many arms, but this one is perfect for this turntable, although few will be aware of how good it really is. It has been kondo rewired back to the energizer and is running a different unpivot damper I am also testing. Lastly, the DS Audio DS003 and energizer completes the front end, this is currently running 600+ hours still in A1 condition and a perfect match for the Anna Log. For these tests the Martin Bastin wave mechanic was replaced with a custom DECO audio governor, this imho is superior to the wave mechanic, switches to 45 rpm without the need to move the belt and more interesting the voltage to the motor, can also be adjusted to present an amazing soundstage, quite unique.
I settled on a Mark Levinson 5805 for the amplification, imho the Swiss army knife of amplifiers, battleship build with most features not touching the surface, but for direct analogue playback, the DS003 through its energizer is top class. Ghekko RCA’s (on trial) feed the 5805 and MCRU Ultimate speaker cables, that then feeds a pair of DALI Epicon 6’s on Townshend podiums of course.
The contenders
MCRU -PWC Record stabiliser (£149)
Black Ravioli-ground (£500)
Solid Steel -weight (£150)
Hexmat- Molekula (£120)
Stack Audio Serene stabiliser £195)
The Black Ravioli (BR) has been my go-to device for a while now. Conscious of its £500 price tag but its musicality outweighs its cost imo. However, my first review of the BR when originally sent one to try was mixed. At the time I was using a hexmat Eclipse, with a Funk Firm Houdini. I found that the BR was fighting against the Hexmat and the Houdini, reverting to the modest Molekula made a significant sonic improvement over the BR with this configuration. However, move on 12 months or so, remove the hexmat eclipse, the Molekula and Houdini go back to using the turntable as intended (no mat) and the BR was head and shoulders above the other stabilisers.
The tests
All sessions started after a 45 min warm up, volume settings remained constant with a host of vinyl and Artists, that I know particularly well.
Starting with the Molekula, I played 4 sides of different albums to understand the sonic differences, I then moved to the Solid Steel weight, completing the same exercise with the other stabilisers. This was to compare the stabilisers with the same albums, the difference being that for consistency, that I finished with the Molekula again at the end of the session.
This process eliminated the Solid Steel weight as a contender. None sounded poor at all but, there were many differences some more subtle than others that would be explored with different Artists to add some emphasis on bass, vocal, mid-range, soundstage etc. I carefully selected 6 different albums to run the next tests, using the same process. The Molekula was next to be eliminated as I believe this stabiliser is best suited to a supplementary mat such as the Eclipse. Although the overall sound was still good and could be lived with, the overall soundstage and musical experience fell just short imo. Likewise, the Stack audio Serene stabiliser bowed out next to the BR and MCRU devices as it just sounded a little slower and sometimes slightly coloured in presentation on the Anna Log.
So next tests after agreeing the final shoot-out, out of the racks came a few firm favourite albums that I know extremely well. I have purposely not read the reviews of these two devices as, I was simply looking to find the most authentic, musical and capable reproduction of the vinyl using the Anna Log for my ears, without getting bogged down in techy hi-fi speak or possibly influencing my decision.
Conclusion
Again, my opinion using the restraints of the system and no sub-mat, was that overall, the MCRU stabiliser that’s not a puck, had edged in front of the BR presenting an improved musical performance from 6 of the 10 albums I had just played. I repeated this with a different 5 albums and both devices as expected by now, were very good and predictable after many hours of listening. The final test, which my wife will agree drove her nuts, was to play the latest 2025 remastered Tracy Chapman first album and the MOFI Fleetwood Mac Tango in the Night, track for track, switching between the two devices to hear each track in isolation, then repeat playing the full albums with each device once more. To corroborate my outcome, I undertook this test twice over another two days, luckily, I like both these albums, not sure that my wife does now.
What I would say is that on cost grounds alone, you would not expect these two devices to be so close in sound quality and although VFM always needs some consideration, I was always looking to determine the best overall sound imo, using my set up not on cost. I rarely put pen to paper as I am not a fan of most hi-fi comics, but the MCRU device is really something especially at this price point, suffice to say I have a new go-to stabiliser that really sings on my Anna Log turntable, that I genuinely believe is the bargain of the vinyl revolution, for my ears anyway.
Lewis Waddington
Had a bit of a revelation over the Christmas period, I read up about North Hill Audio’s new device (apparently I’m not allowed to call it a clamp, weight, puck, whatever). “The PWC Record Stabilizer”. I’m a tough nut to crack, and don’t tend to allow myself to fall for many a lofty claim from companies or individuals that produce hifi products.
If I do get something, I like to run it through objective and subjective tests… but first!
The claims and the background of the product.
The designer’s background as a Subject Matter Expert includes efforts to solve the problem of using mechanical hard drives that are sensitive to vibration to save datastreams correctly under the vibration spectrum of a hovering military helicopter. Which 25 years ago, he successfully did…
“Tests were carried out to damp rotor frequency vibration using polymers supporting a plate to which the drives were fitted, and adjusting the mass of the plate until vibration at the rotor frequency (rotor rpm and number of blades) was successfully nulled. The combination of mass and polymer Shore hardness and density created a mechanical filter which absorbed the vibration effectively and was broader in spectrum than expected, due to the mass of the plate.”
Now retired, he has applied the same technology to his love of turntables, and the result is the PWC record stabilizer. The stabilizer uses the mass of the ‘puck’ combined with balanced, polymer bearing to absorb and nullify system vibrations below the 50hz range. They were tested and tuned using a shaker table that was designed to put the product through its paces in a bench setting.
It’s my turn to put it through the real world test!
Subjective - a bunch of my hifi friends came over for a few drinks and a good listen over the Christmas period. We all came to the conclusion that the PWC record stabilizer brought with it better bass clarity and helped bring down the noise floor of the GL75 (we also tried it on my sl-1200g, but the gains were so much greater on the Lenco) the difference was obvious. The reduction in the low frequency noise allowed the mid and high frequencies to do their thing!
Objective - I know the power of psychoacoustics, so I wanted to see if the numbers matched what I was hearing. As I’ve done with bearings and tonearms I’ve purchased from here, I put them to the test. To test I used the Hifi news analogue test LP and played the 6th band on side two that is used to test residual system noise. I recorded the output from my phono stage into my laptop and zoomed in on the frequencies that the PCW record stabilizer claims to clean up.
You can see from the spectrum analysis in the photos, that without the PCW record stabilizer the low frequency noise is hotter (the upper spectrum analysis in the photos). The lower spectrum analysis using the PCW record stabilizer is cooler (less orange) with less energy in the lower frequencies. The difference is quite impressive. It definitely takes away easily measurable and audible low frequency noise from your turntable.
I’ll be honest, I purchased the stabilizer not expecting to hear this much of a difference. At £150 (I grabbed this one from MCRU dot CO dot UK) It’s definitely the cheapest option I’ve gone for when it comes to pucks/clamps/weights/stabilizers, however in further testing, it outperforms them in reducing my system noise, bothe subjectively and objectively. The others do other things well, but this does what it says on the tin, and does it better!
It takes a lot to convince me, and I don’t like to rely on just my ears. That’s why I like to confirm through testing the data! With that said, I recommend the PCW record stabilizer from North Hill Audio.
-Lewis
